Therefore you have only the rules text provided to use. Maybe the author did intent for you to only be able to steal and not cast higher level spells (even though this wouldn't make a lot of sense given the nature of how Steal Spell works), but he didn't say so in the feat. The only text that matters with respect to the function of a spellthief's Steal Spell supernatural ability is the description of that ability and any errata to it. The rules define a set of general truths and the rules list exceptions to them as needed. That's a bad idea in general for interpreting the rules. Secondly, because they were written by different authors for different purposes it's also not a good idea to try and use one of them as some kind of standard by which to judge the others. You can only interpret them by the rules text as it is written. You don't know their intent because you weren't there. It's not a good idea to try and draw any correlations between them, or try to guess specific author intent as it relates to the individual feats. This also specifies particular parts of the class feature, like the first paragraph of Swift Avenger, but to the unspecified exclusion of others: Smites/day and Bardic Music effects.For one thing, Devoted Performer and Swift Avenger are from entirely different sources than Master Spellthief and written by different authors. Then there are the other feats like Devoted Performer: What about the first part of Swift Avenger? Why doesn't it say "Your druid and scout levels stack for the purpose of your Skirmish feature?" It calls out each part of the feature specifically. I tend to agree but there are many more instances to the contrary. The example makes that reasoning explicit - your logic is invalid unless you can disqualify the example text. If you can steal spell as an Xth level Spellthief, it's plausibly RAW that you can also store & cast that spell, since that's part of the same ability. ![]() There isn't a separate section for storing or casting. The term "Steal Spell" implies the ability Steal Spell (Su), which is literally the name of the main Spellthief ability, and which includes the rules for storing & casting stolen spells. Which is what the term “Steal Spell” implies, especially given the way that the base Spellthief functions.Ī pure Spellthief is like a Disarm specialist, while a Master Spellthief with minimal levels in the actual ST class is more like a Sunder specialist, pretending for a moment that focusing on either of those combat maneuvers was viable in the way the devs occasionally seemed to think. ![]() You are technically correct in that you can use Steal Spell to rip the spell out of an opponent’s head and deny them the potential use of it, but since you can’t store it and can’t cast it, this is often significantly less interesting than, you know, gaining the spell and using it against them. But simply denying the opponent the use of the spell without taking it for yourself, regardless of whether the ability is actually called “Steal Spell” or not, feels less like spell theft and more like spell vandalism.Ī pure Spellthief is like a Disarm specialist, while a Master Spellthief with minimal levels in the actual ST class is more like a Sunder specialist, pretending for a moment that focusing on either of those combat maneuvers was viable in the way the devs occasionally seemed to think. You are using the ability called Steal Spell and removing an opponent’s ability to cast a given spell. You are, as I said, technically correct given the wording of the ability. Which is what the term “Steal Spell” implies, especially given the way that the base Spellthief functions. The feat explicitly does allow you to steal, as far as I can see.Īm I missing something which contradicts that?You are technically correct in that you can use Steal Spell to rip the spell out of an opponent’s head and deny them the potential use of it, but since you can’t store it and can’t cast it, this is often significantly less interesting than, you know, gaining the spell and using it against them. She didn't say "store", she said "steal".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |